From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Timme

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 11, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03003-RBJ (D. Colo. Oct. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03003-RBJ

10-11-2012

BRUCE EDWARD PETERSON, Petitioner, v. RAE TIMME, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents.


FINAL JUDGMENT

PURSUANT to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the orders entered in this case, the following FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered.

I. Pursuant to the Order to Dismiss in Part and For Answer in Part and State Court record #[18] entered by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on April 5, 2012, which order is incorporation by reference, it is

ORDERED that Claims One and Two are dismissed with prejudice as procedurally barred from federal habeas review.

II. Pursuant to the Order Denying Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus #[35] entered by Judge R. Brooke Jackson on October 10, 2012, which order is incorporated by reference, it is

ORDERED that the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability shall not issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 11th day of October, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: ____________

Edward P. Butler

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Peterson v. Timme

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 11, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03003-RBJ (D. Colo. Oct. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Peterson v. Timme

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE EDWARD PETERSON, Petitioner, v. RAE TIMME, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 11, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03003-RBJ (D. Colo. Oct. 11, 2012)