From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 27, 1967
153 N.W.2d 830 (Minn. 1967)

Opinion

No. 39,894.

October 27, 1967.

Contempt — constructive criminal contempt — procedure.

Certiorari upon the relation of Jerome Daly to review an order of the Hennepin County District Court, Rolf Fosseen, Judge, adjudging him guilty of criminal contempt. Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Jerome Daly, pro se, for relator.

James P. Rorris and Dygert Gunn, for respondent.


Relator was convicted of contempt by the District Court of Hennepin County on March 19, 1965. The contempt was both constructive and criminal in nature. Because relator was not afforded a jury trial and the proceedings do not conform to the procedures required by our decision in Peterson v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N.W.2d 825, his conviction must be reversed and a new trial granted.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Peterson v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 27, 1967
153 N.W.2d 830 (Minn. 1967)
Case details for

Peterson v. Peterson

Case Details

Full title:FAYE V. PETERSON v. PALMER A. PETERSON AND ANOTHER. JEROME DALY, RELATOR

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Oct 27, 1967

Citations

153 N.W.2d 830 (Minn. 1967)
153 N.W.2d 830

Citing Cases

Petterson v. Bartels

Jerome Daly and William E. Drexler appeal from an order denying them a new trial in an action brought by Faye…

Peterson v. Peterson

Obviously, this bankruptcy proceeding is but another chapter in bitter and extensive litigation. See, in…