From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Klee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 6, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-11109 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-11109

06-06-2013

DENARD PETERSON, Petitioner, v. PAUL KLEE, Respondent.


Honorable Patrick J. Duggan


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR

IMMEDIATE RELEASE FROM CUSTODY

Petitioner Denard Peterson ("Petitioner"), a Michigan state prisoner in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging his plea-based conviction of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree. On May 31, 2001, Petitioner was sentenced to twenty-three years and nine months to forty years of imprisonment. Presently before the Court is Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Release from Custody. (ECF No. 14.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies Petitioner's motion.

I. ANALYSIS

Petitioner seeks immediate release from custody pending disposition of his habeas petition. Petitioner's argument in favor of release on bail relies upon Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 23(c), which provides:

While a decision ordering the release of a prisoner is under review, the prisoner must-unless the court or judge ordering the decision, or the court of appeals, or the Supreme Court, or a judge or justice of either court orders otherwise-be released on personal recognizance, with or without surety.

Although the United States Supreme Court has held that this rule "undoubtedly creates a presumption of release from custody[,]" Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 774, 107 S. Ct. 2113, 2117 (1987), Rule 23(c) addresses situations where a party appeals a district court's decision granting habeas relief and ordering a petitioner's release. This Court has not granted habeas relief in this case. Rule 23(c), therefore, is inapplicable to the instant case.

II. CONCLUSION AND ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, the Court finds that Petitioner is not entitled to immediate release from custody.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Release from Custody, (ECF No. 14), is DENIED.

PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Denard Peterson, # 347506
Woodland Center Correctional Facility
9036 E M-36
Whitmore Lake, MI 48189
Anica Letica, A.A.G.
Mark G. Sands, A.A.G


Summaries of

Peterson v. Klee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 6, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-11109 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Peterson v. Klee

Case Details

Full title:DENARD PETERSON, Petitioner, v. PAUL KLEE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-11109 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 6, 2013)