From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Hancock

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 15, 2015
No. 05-15-00113-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2015)

Opinion

No. 05-15-00113-CV

06-15-2015

LAKESHA PETERSON, Appellant v. CAMERON HANCOCK, Appellee


On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-20377

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart
Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk's record in this case are past due. By postcard dated January 28, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated January 28, 2015, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated March 26, 2015, we informed appellant the clerk's record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk's record or written documentation that appellant had been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 150113F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-20377.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee CAMERON HANCOCK recover the costs of this appeal from appellant LAKESHA PETERSON.


Summaries of

Peterson v. Hancock

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 15, 2015
No. 05-15-00113-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Peterson v. Hancock

Case Details

Full title:LAKESHA PETERSON, Appellant v. CAMERON HANCOCK, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jun 15, 2015

Citations

No. 05-15-00113-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 15, 2015)