From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Fordham Cornice Works, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 7, 1930
170 N.E. 157 (N.Y. 1930)

Opinion

Argued November 25, 1929

Decided January 7, 1930

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

William A. Schacht for appellant.

Samuel Robert Weltz for respondent.


Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Not sitting: CARDOZO, Ch. J.


Summaries of

Peterson v. Fordham Cornice Works, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 7, 1930
170 N.E. 157 (N.Y. 1930)
Case details for

Peterson v. Fordham Cornice Works, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN PETERSON, Appellant, v. THE FORDHAM CORNICE WORKS, INC., Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 7, 1930

Citations

170 N.E. 157 (N.Y. 1930)
170 N.E. 157

Citing Cases

O'Connell v. Williams

This court, of course, upon timely application, has a right to entertain a reargument of the motion to set…

Goodrich v. Ross-Ketchum Co.

) A trial judge, even though he once denies a motion to set aside a verdict, may entertain a reargument…