From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 8, 2021
2:19-cv-01480 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01480 WBS GGH P

06-08-2021

RICHARD ANTHONY PETERSON, Petitioner, v. RALPH M. DIAZ, Respondent.


ORDER

WILLIAM B.SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRJCT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 29, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 56. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 29, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 54) is granted; and 3. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Peterson v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 8, 2021
2:19-cv-01480 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Peterson v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ANTHONY PETERSON, Petitioner, v. RALPH M. DIAZ, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 8, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-01480 WBS GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2021)