From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Clark

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 8, 2008
No. C 07-04069 CW PR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 07-04069 CW PR.

February 8, 2008


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE


Petitioner, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at California State Prison in Corcoran, California, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby issues the following orders:

The application to proceed IFP is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order and the petition and all attachments thereto upon Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California.

Respondent shall file with this Court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty (60) days of the issuance of this Order, an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued. Respondent shall file with the answer a copy of all portions of the state record that have been previously transcribed and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the petition.

If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it upon Respondent within thirty (30) days of his receipt of the answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Peterson v. Clark

United States District Court, N.D. California
Feb 8, 2008
No. C 07-04069 CW PR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Peterson v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:LARRY D PETERSON, Plaintiff, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 8, 2008

Citations

No. C 07-04069 CW PR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2008)