From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petersen v. Sims

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 3, 2021
1:20-cv-00884-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00884-DAD-EPG

11-03-2021

KYLE PETERSON, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY SIMS, JR., Defendant.


EX PARTE ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 29)

Before the Court is the ex parte application Defendant Anthony Sims, Jr., for an extension of time to respond to the complaint. (ECF No. 29). As grounds, Defendant states that his request for representation by the Department of Justice was just recently approved on October 22, 2021. Defendant intends to file a motion to dismiss on multiple issues and would be unable to do so by the current deadline to respond, November 9, 2021, and thus requests an extension of time until January 10, 2022 to respond to the complaint.

Being sufficiently advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the ex parte application (ECF No. 29) is granted. Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiffs complaint no later than January 10, 2022.

However, no further extensions of time will be granted to this deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Petersen v. Sims

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 3, 2021
1:20-cv-00884-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Petersen v. Sims

Case Details

Full title:KYLE PETERSON, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY SIMS, JR., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00884-DAD-EPG (E.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021)