From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petersen v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 13, 2017
2016-1690 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1690

01-13-2017

GAYLE M. PETERSEN, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

WENDELL C. ROBINSON, Law Offices of Wendell C. Robinson, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. KATRINA LEDERER, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRYAN G. POLISUK.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-1221-15-0945-W-1.

JUDGMENT

WENDELL C. ROBINSON, Law Offices of Wendell C. Robinson, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. KATRINA LEDERER, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRYAN G. POLISUK. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O'MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 13, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Petersen v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 13, 2017
2016-1690 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Petersen v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:GAYLE M. PETERSEN, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 13, 2017

Citations

2016-1690 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2017)