From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petersen v. Employment Dept

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 28, 1995
898 P.2d 222 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

93-T-0078A; CA A84588

Argued March 10, 1995.

Submitted March 10, 1995. Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in part; otherwise affirmed June 28, 1995.

Judicial Review from Employment Department.

Jeffrey E. Potter argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack A. Gardner and Lombard, Gardner, Honsowetz, Potter Budge.

Stephen L. Madkour, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Assessment for services provided by Jones, David, and Smith reversed and remanded for reconsideration; otherwise affirmed.


This is the companion case to Petersen v. Employment Dept. (A84589), 135 Or. App. 344, 898 P.2d 210 (1995). With the exception that this case did not involve the provision of services before October 4, 1989, the material facts and issues presented in this case are identical to those in that case. We adopt and reiterate our analysis in Petersen pertaining to the period October 4, 1989 through December 31, 1992.

Assessment for services provided by Jones, David, and Smith reversed and remanded for reconsideration; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

Petersen v. Employment Dept

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 28, 1995
898 P.2d 222 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Petersen v. Employment Dept

Case Details

Full title:Barbara PETERSEN, dba Husband's Plumbing, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 28, 1995

Citations

898 P.2d 222 (Or. Ct. App. 1995)
898 P.2d 222