Petersen v. Columbia Cas. Co.

1 Citing case

  1. QBE Americas, Inc. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co.

    997 N.Y.S.2d 670 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2014)   Cited 2 times

    California law is not in conflict with New York law on this issue. See Kozlowski, 18 AD3d at 42, citing Gon v. First State Ins. Co., 871 F.2d 863, 868–69 (9th Cir1989) ; see also Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Ambassador Group, Inc., 157 A.D.2d 293, 299 (1st Dept 1990) ; but see Petersen v. Columbia Cas. Co., 2012 WL 5316352, at *8–10 (CD Cal 2012) (comparing New York and California law); cf. In re Kenai Corp., 136 BR 59, 63–64 (SDNY 1992) (Wood, J.) (questioning logic of mandating advancement of defense costs in non-duty to defend policies, albeit at time when New York law was unsettled)