From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. v. Folino

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 18, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3254 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 18, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3254.

August 18, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2008, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Petitioner's "Traverse Response" to Respondents' Answer Filed, the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge and the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Strawbridge is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Peters v. v. Folino

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 18, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3254 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 18, 2008)
Case details for

Peters v. v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:DALE R. PETERS v. LOUIS S. FOLINO, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 18, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-3254 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 18, 2008)