From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 23, 2021
Civil Action 4:21-CV-3039 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:21-CV-3039

09-23-2021

MICHAEL G. PETERS, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE and DINAH HUFFMAN, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Kenneth M. Hoyt United States District Judge

Michael G. Peters, an inmate incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, has filed a prisoner civil rights complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. This action is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

Barring a show of imminent danger, under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, a prisoner may not file an action in forma pauperis if he has, on three or more occasions, filed a prisoner action in federal district court or an appeal in a federal court of appeals that was dismissed as frivolous or malicious. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385 (5th Cir. 1996). Peters has accumulated at least 11 such dismissals. He is no longer allowed to proceed in forma pauperis under section 1915(g). See Peters v. TDCJ, No. 4:21-cv-2447 (S.D. Tex. July 29, 2021); Peters v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, No. 3:21-cv-14 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 1, 2021); Peters v. Valigura, No. 4:15-cv-3032 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2016); Peters v. Texas Medical Board, No. 4:15-cv-3021 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2015); Peters v. Rollins, No. 4:15-cv-3036 (S.D. Tex. Oct, 27, 2015); Peters v. Duckworth, No. 4:15-cv-3024 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2015); Peters v. Harrison, No. 4:15-cv-3037 (S.D. Tex. Oct, 19. 2015); Peters v. BB&T Bank, No. 4:15-cv-3035 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 15, 2015); Peters v. Dreyer, No. 4:15-cv-289 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 14, 2015); Peters v. Dreyer, No. 4:15-cv-2900 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 6, 2015); Peters v. Gilbert, No. 4:15-cv-2762 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 2015). Peters' complaint does not allege that he is in any imminent danger.

In light of the pleadings and his litigation history, Peters has failed to show that he is eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. This action is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and Peters' motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. # 2) is DENIED. This dismissal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the parties and to the TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel, P.O. Box 13084, Austin, Texas 78711, Fax Number (512) 936-2159, and to the three strikes coordinator for this district, Three Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Peters v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 23, 2021
Civil Action 4:21-CV-3039 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Peters v. Tex. Dep't of Criminal Justice

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL G. PETERS, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE and…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 4:21-CV-3039 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2021)

Citing Cases

Peters v. Patrick

Peters had at least thirteen such dismissals before filing his notice of appeal in this case, and is no…

Peters v. Abbott

Peters had at least twelve such dismissals before filing his complaint in this case, and is no longer allowed…