From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Mar 1, 2012
NO. 02-11-00243-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 1, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-11-00243-CV

03-01-2012

REGINALD DALE PETERS APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE


FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On February 6, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

On November 23, 2011, appellant filed a "Motion To Correct Erroneous Filing Fee's." We have considered that motion.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and deny the "Motion To Correct Erroneous Filing Fee's." See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f)."

PER CURIAM PANEL: GABRIEL, J; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Peters v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Mar 1, 2012
NO. 02-11-00243-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Peters v. State

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD DALE PETERS APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Mar 1, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-11-00243-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 1, 2012)