From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. Rash Curtis & Assocs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2013
CASE NO. 12-CV-05727 TEH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12-CV-05727 TEH

03-04-2013

MARK PETERS AND DENISE PETERS Plaintiff(s), v. RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES Defendant(s).

Attorney for Plaintiff Tammy Hussin Attorney for Defendant Andrew M. Steinheimer


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)

[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

[×] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

Private Process:

[ ] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) __________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[ ] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

[ ] other requested deadline __________

____________________

Attorney for Plaintiff

Tammy Hussin

___________________

Attorney for Defendant

Andrew M. Steinheimer
[PROPOSED] ORDER

[ ] The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

[×] The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

The ADR session shall be completed by 10/15/2013.

Thelton E. Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."


Summaries of

Peters v. Rash Curtis & Assocs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 4, 2013
CASE NO. 12-CV-05727 TEH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Peters v. Rash Curtis & Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:MARK PETERS AND DENISE PETERS Plaintiff(s), v. RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 12-CV-05727 TEH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013)