From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. Mills

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 1, 2022
21 Civ. 5527 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 5527 (ER)

02-01-2022

ZIPHAIRE W. PETERS, Plaintiff, v. TINESHA MILLS, SANTIAGO, and COMMISSIONER CYNTHIA BRAUN, Defendants.


ORDER

Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on December 17, 2021. Doc. 14. Defendants mailed notice of the motion to Peters, indicating that Peters' opposition was due January 18, 2022. As of this date, Peters has not submitted a response. Peters is therefore directed to submit a response by March 1, 2022. Failure to do so will result in the Court deeming the motion unopposed.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of this order to the Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Peters v. Mills

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 1, 2022
21 Civ. 5527 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Peters v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:ZIPHAIRE W. PETERS, Plaintiff, v. TINESHA MILLS, SANTIAGO, and…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 1, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 5527 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2022)