From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. Huttel

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 23, 2021
15 Civ. 9274 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2021)

Opinion

15 Civ. 9274 (NSR)

08-23-2021

TYRONE PETERS, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTION OFFICER HUTTEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Nelson S. Roman, U.S.D.J.

The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within sixty (60) days of the date hereof.

The parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next 60 days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at the address listed on ECF and to file proof of service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Peters v. Huttel

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 23, 2021
15 Civ. 9274 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Peters v. Huttel

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE PETERS, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTION OFFICER HUTTEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 23, 2021

Citations

15 Civ. 9274 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2021)