From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. Hollembaek

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 30, 2018
No. 18-6011 (4th Cir. May. 30, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-6011

05-30-2018

SHANNON ANDRE PETERS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. STEPHANIE HOLLEMBAEK, Respondent - Appellee.

Shannon Andre Peters, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:16-hc-02049-BO) Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shannon Andre Peters, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shannon Andre Peters, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peters v. Hollembaek, No. 5:16-hc-02049-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 18, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Peters v. Hollembaek

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 30, 2018
No. 18-6011 (4th Cir. May. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Peters v. Hollembaek

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON ANDRE PETERS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. STEPHANIE HOLLEMBAEK…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 30, 2018

Citations

No. 18-6011 (4th Cir. May. 30, 2018)