From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterman v. Causey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 28, 2013
521 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1338

05-28-2013

DIANNA PETERMAN; B.P., A Minor Child, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. PAT CAUSEY; ELIZABETH SPILLMAN; MELINDA NORMAN; RICHARD GENTRY; ALICIA STORIE; HEATHER HENNESSEE; CASEY PUETT; AIMEE FAIRCHILD; JOHN BOYD; ROBERT BRADY; C. V. MORRIS; RALPH D. YOUNT; ALAN LECROY; LAURA GENTRY; UNKNOWN, Defendants - Appellees.

Dianna Peterman, B.P., Appellants Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00029-RLV) Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dianna Peterman, B.P., Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dianna Peterman and B.P., a minor child, appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and remanding child custody proceedings to state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peterman v. Causey, No. 5:13-cv-00029-RLV (W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2013). We also deny Peterman's motion for a stay of the state court proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Peterman v. Causey

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 28, 2013
521 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Peterman v. Causey

Case Details

Full title:DIANNA PETERMAN; B.P., A Minor Child, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. PAT…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 28, 2013

Citations

521 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2013)