From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peter v. Wojcicki

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 11, 2022
2:21-cv-02026-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02026-APG-EJY

01-11-2022

MARIA PETER, Plaintiff v. SUSAN DIANE WOJCICKI, et al., Defendants


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE [ECF NO. 5]

ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On December 21, 2021, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss this case for lack of personal jurisdiction. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff Maria Peter did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah's report and recommendation (ECF No. 5) is accepted and plaintiff Maria Peter's complaint (ECF No. 4-1) is dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.


Summaries of

Peter v. Wojcicki

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 11, 2022
2:21-cv-02026-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Peter v. Wojcicki

Case Details

Full title:MARIA PETER, Plaintiff v. SUSAN DIANE WOJCICKI, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 11, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02026-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2022)