From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peter v. Karleen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 22, 2008
51 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3702.

May 22, 2008.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Karen I. Lupuloff, J.), entered December 5, 2007, which, after a fact-finding hearing, in this proceeding brought pursuant to article 8 of the Family Court Act, dismissed the petition seeking an order of protection, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Levine Gilbert, New York (Harvey A. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Richard J. Feinberg, New City, for respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Andrias, Nardelli, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.


The court properly dismissed the petition where the evidence failed to establish by a fair preponderance thereof that respondent committed acts that would constitute assault in the third degree during an incident where the parties' five-year-old son would not willingly attend a weekend visit with petitioner ( see Family Ct Act § 812; § 832; Penal Law § 120.00). There exists no basis upon which to disturb the court's credibility determinations ( see Matter of Smith v Smith, 308 AD2d 592).

We decline to review petitioner's request that the Family Court Judge be recused and that his custody petition be assigned to a different judge, since this issue is raised for the first time on appeal.


Summaries of

Peter v. Karleen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 22, 2008
51 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Peter v. Karleen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PETER G., Appellant, v. KARLEEN K., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 22, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4610
856 N.Y.S.2d 859

Citing Cases

Yoda, LLC v. National Union Fire Insurance

In light of this Court's earlier ruling, the Supreme Court properly denied National Union's prediscovery…

William M. v. Elba Q.

second degree and menacing in the third degree (Family Court Act § 821[1]; Penal Law §§ 120.15; 240.26[1];…