From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petchatat v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 25, 2023
No. 22467-21S (U.S.T.C. May. 25, 2023)

Opinion

22467-21S

05-25-2023

NANTAWOOT PETCHATAT & JILL NGUYEN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Eunkyong Choi, Special Trial Judge.

If respondent wishes to continue to assert the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) in this case, he shall file a status report and attach thereto a Case History Transcript and any other relevant documents to demonstrate compliance with section 6751(b)(1). Alternatively, if respondent concludes that he did not comply with the requirement under section 6751(b)(1) with respect to the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a), he should consider conceding that penalty and notify the Court by filing a status report. Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that, if the parties do not submit a proposed decision document which states there is not any section 6662(a) penalty due from petitioners for the year(s) in issue before August 11, 2023, then on or before August 11, 2023, respondent shall file a status report attaching thereto any relevant documents to demonstrate compliance with section 6751(b)(1) or notifying the Court whether he concedes the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a).


Summaries of

Petchatat v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 25, 2023
No. 22467-21S (U.S.T.C. May. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Petchatat v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:NANTAWOOT PETCHATAT & JILL NGUYEN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: May 25, 2023

Citations

No. 22467-21S (U.S.T.C. May. 25, 2023)