From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pesta v. Warren

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County
Apr 28, 2005
C.A. No. 03C-04-294 SCD (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 28, 2005)

Opinion

C.A. No. 03C-04-294 SCD.

April 28, 2005.


ORDER


This 28th day of April, 2005, Plaintiff's Motion for Reargument pursuant to Rule 59 having been duly considered, it appears that:

1. Plaintiffs have not shown that the Court misapprehended the law or facts as would affect the outcome of its decision.

E.I. DuPont deNemours Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co., Del. Super., C.A. No. 89C-AU-99, Steele, V.C. (Nov. 17, 1994), 1994 WL 682420 at *7 (citing Wilshire Restaurant Group, Inc. v. Ramada, Inc., Del. Ch., C.A. No. 11506, Jacobs, V.C. (Dec. 19, 1990) Let. Op. at 2).

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff's motion for Reargument is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pesta v. Warren

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County
Apr 28, 2005
C.A. No. 03C-04-294 SCD (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 28, 2005)
Case details for

Pesta v. Warren

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA PESTA, Plaintiff, v. GALE WARREN and GARY WARREN, Defendants

Court:Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County

Date published: Apr 28, 2005

Citations

C.A. No. 03C-04-294 SCD (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 28, 2005)