Opinion
C.A. No. 03C-04-294 SCD.
April 28, 2005.
ORDER
This 28th day of April, 2005, Plaintiff's Motion for Reargument pursuant to Rule 59 having been duly considered, it appears that:
1. Plaintiffs have not shown that the Court misapprehended the law or facts as would affect the outcome of its decision.
E.I. DuPont deNemours Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co., Del. Super., C.A. No. 89C-AU-99, Steele, V.C. (Nov. 17, 1994), 1994 WL 682420 at *7 (citing Wilshire Restaurant Group, Inc. v. Ramada, Inc., Del. Ch., C.A. No. 11506, Jacobs, V.C. (Dec. 19, 1990) Let. Op. at 2).
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff's motion for Reargument is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.