Opinion
AC 46453
04-23-2024
Edward A. PERUTA v. IMAGINEERS, INC., et al.
Plaintiff’s appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Hartford, Sicilian, J.
Elgo, Moll and Clark, Js.
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the granting of the defendants’ motions to strike the plaintiff’s revised complaint in its entirety. During oral argument before this court, the plaintiff abandoned his claims on appeal with respect to counts one through twenty-four of his revised complaint. With respect to counts twenty-five through thirty-two of the revised complaint, the plaintiff’s claims on appeal are inadequately briefed, and, thus, we decline to review them. See Pryor v. Pryor, 162 Conn. App. 451, 458, 133 A.3d 463 (2016).