From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peruskie v. Worthington

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Apr 5, 2022
No. A-1-CA-39909 (N.M. Ct. App. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

A-1-CA-39909

04-05-2022

JOANNA PERUSKIE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. BRYAN WORTHINGTON, Respondent-Appellant.

Joanna I. Peruskie Carlsbad, NM Pro Se Appellee Bryan M. Worthington Carlsbad, NM Pro Se Appellant


Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court's discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in Odyssey.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY Jane Schuler Gray, District Judge

Joanna I. Peruskie Carlsbad, NM Pro Se Appellee

Bryan M. Worthington Carlsbad, NM Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

J. MILES HANISEE, CHIEF JUDGE

{¶1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.

{¶2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR: JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge, MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge


Summaries of

Peruskie v. Worthington

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Apr 5, 2022
No. A-1-CA-39909 (N.M. Ct. App. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Peruskie v. Worthington

Case Details

Full title:JOANNA PERUSKIE, Petitioner-Appellee, v. BRYAN WORTHINGTON…

Court:Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

No. A-1-CA-39909 (N.M. Ct. App. Apr. 5, 2022)