The meaning of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re Marriage of Persinger, 188 Wn.App. 606, 609, 355 P.3d 291 (2015). "The purpose of statutory interpretation is to determine and give effect to the legislature's intent."
"We review a CR 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion." In re Marriage of Persinger, 188 Wn.App. 606, 608, 355 P.3d 291 (2015). "'A trial court abuses its discretion if its decision is manifestly unreasonable or based on untenable grounds or untenable reasons.'" Id. at 609 (quoting In re Marriage of Littlefield, 133 Wn.2d 39, 46-47, 940 P.2d 1362 (1997)). In other words, an "abuse of discretion is found if the trial court relies on unsupported facts, takes a view that no reasonable person would take, applies the wrong legal standard, or bases its ruling on an erroneous view of the law."
¶42 " CR 60(b)(5) mandates the court [to] vacate a void judgment upon motion of a party, irrespective of the lapse of time." In re the Marriage of Persinger , 188 Wash. App. 606, 609, 355 P.3d 291 (2015).
In re Marriage of Persinger, 188 Wn.App. 606, 608, 355 P.3d 291 (2015). Arugonda avers that both the March 27 and July 20 CR 60(a) orders were in fact corrections because the judge's intent was always clear and all the challenged orders did was rectify mistakes that did not reflect that intent.
This court reviews a trial court's denial of a CR 60(b) motion to vacate for abuse of discretion. In re Marriage of Persinger, 188 Wn.App. 606, 608, 355 P.3d 291 (2015). A trial court operates within its discretion where its findings derive from the factual record, its conclusions apply sound law, and its decisions are not manifestly unreasonable.
"[R]eview of a CR 60(b) decision is limited to the trial court's decision, not the underlying order the party seeks to vacate." In re Marriage of Persinger, 188 Wn.App. 606, 609, 355 P.3d 291 (2015).
"[R]eview of a CR 60(b) decision is limited to the trial court's decision, not the underlying order the party seeks to vacate." In re Marriage of Persinger, 188 Wn.App. 606, 609, 355 P.3d 291 (2015). Generally, we will not overturn a trial court's decision on a CR 60(b) motion to vacate unless it plainly appears that the trial court abused its discretion.
Id. "CR 60(b)(5) mandates the court vacate a void judgment upon motion of a party, irrespective of the lapse of time." Persinger v. Persinger, 188 Wn.App. 606, 609, 355 P.3d 291 (2015).
"[R]eview of a CR 60(b) decision is limited to the trial court's decision, not the underlying order the party seeks to vacate." In re Marriage of Persinger, 188 Wn.App. 606, 609, 355 P.3d 291 (2015). The party seeking relief under CR 60(b) bears the burden of showing relief is warranted.
Id. "CR 60(b)(5) mandates the court vacate a void judgment upon motion of a party, irrespective of the lapse of time." Persinger v. Persinger, 188 Wn.App. 606, 609, 355 P.3d 291 (2015).