From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perryman v. U.S. Internal Revenue Serv.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
2:21-cv-0044 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0044 CKD P

07-01-2021

DAVID PERRYMAN, Plaintiff, v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 18, 2021, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Perryman v. U.S. Internal Revenue Serv.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 1, 2021
2:21-cv-0044 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Perryman v. U.S. Internal Revenue Serv.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PERRYMAN, Plaintiff, v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 1, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0044 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2021)