From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perryman v. Deacon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 2, 2014
2:12-CV-01234-AC (D. Or. Mar. 2, 2014)

Opinion

2:12-CV-01234-AC

03-02-2014

DENNIS PERRYMAN, Plaintiff, v. JAMES DEACON, STEVE FRANKIE, LEONARD WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT J. EDISON, K. HENDRICKS, Defendants.

Dennis Perryman Pro Se Plaintiff Shannon M. Vincent OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Trial Division, CLS Attorney for Defendants


ORDER

Dennis Perryman

Pro Se Plaintiff Shannon M. Vincent
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Trial Division, CLS

Attorney for Defendants HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") [78] on January 31, 2014, recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment [45] be granted. Because no objections to the F&R were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's F&R [78]. Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment [45] is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Perryman v. Deacon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Mar 2, 2014
2:12-CV-01234-AC (D. Or. Mar. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Perryman v. Deacon

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS PERRYMAN, Plaintiff, v. JAMES DEACON, STEVE FRANKIE, LEONARD…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Mar 2, 2014

Citations

2:12-CV-01234-AC (D. Or. Mar. 2, 2014)