From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Wayne

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 12, 2022
22 Civ. 10316 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 10316 (AT)

12-12-2022

GREG PERRY AND PEABODY & COMPANY LLC, Plaintiffs, v. RODERICK WAYNE, JR. p/k/a RODDY RICCH; SAMUEL GLOADE p/k/a 30 ROC; LAMAR ADARIUS MORAGNE; AQEEL QADIR TATE; KHIRYE TYLER, LARRANCE LEV AR DOPSON; BLUE NIKE PUBLISHING LLC; PEERMUSIC III, LTD.; KOBALT MUSIC PUBLISHING AMERICA, INC.; VOLUME VENTURES PUBLISHING, LLC; WARNER-TAMERLANE PUBLISHING CORORPATION; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION d/b/a ATLANTIC RECORDS, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear- and be heard by all other-participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perry v. Wayne

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 12, 2022
22 Civ. 10316 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Perry v. Wayne

Case Details

Full title:GREG PERRY AND PEABODY & COMPANY LLC, Plaintiffs, v. RODERICK WAYNE, JR…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 12, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 10316 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2022)