From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Walker

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 437
Jul 24, 2008
286 F. App'x 436 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-15688.

Submitted July 14, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed July 24, 2008.

Edgar Perry, pro se.

Stephanie Walker, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 08-CV-00787-CRB.

Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


A review of the record, appellant's opening brief, and the parties' responses to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so in-substantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Perry v. Walker

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 437
Jul 24, 2008
286 F. App'x 436 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Perry v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:Edgar PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephanie WALKER, Defendant-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 437

Date published: Jul 24, 2008

Citations

286 F. App'x 436 (9th Cir. 2008)