Opinion
No. ED 109857
08-16-2022
Elon PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203. FOR RESPONDENT: Zeb J. Charlton, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Missouri Public Defender's Office, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203.
FOR RESPONDENT: Zeb J. Charlton, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Kelly C. Broniec, P.J., Philip M. Hess, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Elon Perry ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises one Point on appeal, arguing the motion court clearly erred finding Movant's right to effective assistance of counsel was not violated due to his plea counsel's purported conflict of interest.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b)(2).