From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Nordstrom, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division
Apr 29, 2024
1:23-CV-01011-RP (W.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-CV-01011-RP

04-29-2024

ASHLEY PERRY and SARAH JOHNSTON, Plaintiffs v. NORDSTROM, INC., Defendant


ORDER

SUSAN HIGHTOWER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On April 25, 2024, the District Court denied Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and dismissed Defendant Mateo Giraldo from this action. Dkt. 32. The majority of the dates in the parties' previous Joint Proposed Scheduling Order (Dkt. 13) have expired. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to file a Joint Amended Proposed Scheduling Order omitting all expired dates by May 10, 2024. The parties are ORDERED to use District Judge Robert Pitman's form scheduling order available on the website for the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (www.txwd.uscourts.gov).


Summaries of

Perry v. Nordstrom, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division
Apr 29, 2024
1:23-CV-01011-RP (W.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Perry v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ASHLEY PERRY and SARAH JOHNSTON, Plaintiffs v. NORDSTROM, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division

Date published: Apr 29, 2024

Citations

1:23-CV-01011-RP (W.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 2024)