From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Nicklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aug 14, 2015
Civil No. 15-2763 (PJS/HB) (D. Minn. Aug. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 15-2763 (PJS/HB)

08-14-2015

Dawn Perry, Petitioner, v. Julie Nicklin, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

3. Petitioner Dawn Perry's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: 8/14/15

s/Patrick J. Schiltz

PATRICK J. SCHILTZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Perry v. Nicklin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aug 14, 2015
Civil No. 15-2763 (PJS/HB) (D. Minn. Aug. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Perry v. Nicklin

Case Details

Full title:Dawn Perry, Petitioner, v. Julie Nicklin, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Aug 14, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 15-2763 (PJS/HB) (D. Minn. Aug. 14, 2015)