From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 3, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-113 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-113

03-03-2016

JAMES PERRY, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD MILLER; D.A. JOHN PECK; CITY OF MONESSEN; POLICE CHIEF OF MONESSEN; MAGISTRATE JOSEPH R. DEMARCHIS; KATHLEEN KANE; A.G. SHEEHAN BALCHON; and JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICER, Defendants.

cc: James Perry 3495-2013 3000 S. Grande Blvd. Greensburg, PA 15601 All Counsel of Record Via Electronic Mail


Magistrate Judge Lenihan ECF Nos. 22, 35, 39, 59, 62 MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff delivered his Complaint to the clerk of courts for the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on January 27, 2015. The Complaint was filed on February 18, 2015, and referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 62) filed on February 12, 2016, recommended that the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Police Chief of Monessen, and City of Monessen (ECF No. 59); Defendant Joseph R. DeMarchis (ECF No. 39); Defendants Sheehan Balchon, Kathleen Kane, and Richard Miller (ECF No. 22); and Defendant John Peck (ECF No. 35) be granted. Service was made on all counsel of record and on the pro se Plaintiff. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local Rule of Court 72.D.2, the parties had fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections were filed.

After review of the pleadings, and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Police Chief of Monessen, and City of Monessen at ECF No. 59 is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Joseph R. DeMarchis at ECF No. 39 is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Sheehan Balchon, Kathleen Kane, and Richard Miller at ECF No. 22 is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant John Peck at ECF No. 35 is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 62) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated February 12, 2016, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall mark the case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT

/s/ JOY FLOWERS CONTI

JOY FLOWERS CONTI

Chief United States District Judge cc: James Perry

3495-2013

3000 S. Grande Blvd.

Greensburg, PA 15601

All Counsel of Record

Via Electronic Mail


Summaries of

Perry v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 3, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-113 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2016)
Case details for

Perry v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PERRY, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD MILLER; D.A. JOHN PECK; CITY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 3, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-113 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2016)

Citing Cases

Graves v. Burns

These claims too, are obviously time barred."), report and recommendation adopted, No. CV 15-113, 2016 WL…