From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Michael

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Jun 22, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-34 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 22, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-34 (WLS)

06-22-2012

ANGELO PERRY, Petitioner, v. REGINALD D. MICHAEL, Respondent.


ORDER

Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed May 9, 2012. (Doc. 18). It is recommended that Petitioner's habeas petition be dismissed. (Doc. 18 at 3).

The Report and Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id.) The period for objections expired on Wednesday, May 23, 2012; no objections have been filed to date. (See Docket).

Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Recommendation (Doc. 18) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Petitioner's habeas petition is DISMISSED.

________________________

THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS ,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Perry v. Michael

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Jun 22, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-34 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Perry v. Michael

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO PERRY, Petitioner, v. REGINALD D. MICHAEL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

Date published: Jun 22, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-34 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 22, 2012)