From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Larkin Furnace Construction Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 11, 1983
305 S.E.2d 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

65570.

DECIDED MAY 11, 1983.

Action for damages. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Bell.

J. Eugene Wilson, for appellant.

Harry W. Bassler, John H. Hicks, J. Kenneth Moorman, Marjorie M. Rogers, for appellees.


Perry sued for personal injuries suffered in the explosion of a zinc smelting furnace, alleging that the explosion was caused by defects in the condenser neck built by appellee Engineered Sheet Metal Products and installed by appellee Larkin Furnace Construction Company. Summary judgment was granted in favor of both defendants. Perry appeals on the ground that appellees as moving parties failed to show that the explosion was not the result of their improper design and construction of the furnace. Held:

The deposition testimony reveals that the explosion was caused by plastic tubing which had not been removed from the new condenser neck before the furnace was fired. The outer metal sleeve of the condenser neck was fabricated by Engineered pursuant to specifications provided by appellant's employer, Southern Zinc. Larkin Furnace attached the neck to the condenser box by pouring concrete over the neck with a plastic tube inserted in the core. After the neck was attached, it was the responsibility of Southern Zinc's employees to remove the tubing before charging the furnace. In particular, it was the sole responsibility of the shift foreman to ascertain that the tubing was removed. Perry admitted that as shift foreman he always inspected the necks and removed the tubing and stated that he had done so in this instance but saw none. It is undisputed that if the tubing had been removed the accident would not have occurred.

Thus, in support of their motions for summary judgment, appellees have submitted evidence showing that they breached no duty owed to appellant and that there was no causal connection between their conduct and the injuries suffered. Those being two indispensable elements of an action for negligence, their absence is fatal to appellant's action against Engineered and Larkin, and the grants of summary judgment were proper. See Davis v. B. E. K., Inc., 162 Ga. App. 92, 93 (3) ( 290 S.E.2d 305) (1982).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., concurs. Carley, J., concurs in the judgment only.

DECIDED MAY 11, 1983.


Summaries of

Perry v. Larkin Furnace Construction Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 11, 1983
305 S.E.2d 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Perry v. Larkin Furnace Construction Company

Case Details

Full title:PERRY v. LARKIN FURNACE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 11, 1983

Citations

305 S.E.2d 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
305 S.E.2d 158