Perry v. Five Diamond Screening, LLC

Full title: RUSSELL T. PERRY, Plaintiff, v. FIVE DIAMOND SCREENING, LLC, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 8, 2022

2:22-cv-00848-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 8, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00848-APG-BNW

12-08-2022

RUSSELL T. PERRY, Plaintiff, v. FIVE DIAMOND SCREENING, LLC, Defendant.

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Michael C. Mills Nevada Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell, PLLC and John W. Drury Admitted Pro Hac Vice Seyfarth Shaw LLP Counsel for Defendant Five Diamond Screening, LLC

ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Michael C. Mills Nevada Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell, PLLC and John W. Drury Admitted Pro Hac Vice Seyfarth Shaw LLP Counsel for Defendant Five Diamond Screening, LLC

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF FIVE DIAMOND SCREENING, LLC

ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Russell T. Perry, and Defendant, Five Diamond Screening, LLC (“Five Diamond”), and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate and agree that the above-titled action is dismissed, with prejudice. Each party will bear their own costs and attorney's fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.