From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Cartocci

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Sep 20, 2011
80 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011)

Summary

holding that, "[s]ince Massachusetts law does not recognize the doctrine of anticipatory breach," the contract at issue could not have been breached until after the promisor's time for performance had expired, even though the promisor had previously told the promisee that "all deals were off"

Summary of this case from Obourn v. Am. Well Corp.

Opinion

No. 10-P-1694.

September 20, 2011.


DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Perry v. Cartocci

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Sep 20, 2011
80 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011)

holding that, "[s]ince Massachusetts law does not recognize the doctrine of anticipatory breach," the contract at issue could not have been breached until after the promisor's time for performance had expired, even though the promisor had previously told the promisee that "all deals were off"

Summary of this case from Obourn v. Am. Well Corp.
Case details for

Perry v. Cartocci

Case Details

Full title:TANA M. PERRY v. MICHELLE M. CARTOCCI

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

80 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011)

Citing Cases

Obourn v. Am. Well Corp.

Anticipating an argument by Obourn based on anticipatory breach, American Well points out that, under…