From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PERRY v. BUSS

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 28, 2011
Case No. 3:08cv323/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv323/RV/EMT.

March 28, 2011


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 24, 2011 (Doc. 17). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

PERRY v. BUSS

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Mar 28, 2011
Case No. 3:08cv323/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2011)
Case details for

PERRY v. BUSS

Case Details

Full title:LEO EDWARD PERRY, JR., Petitioner, v. EDWIN G. BUSS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Mar 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv323/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Mar. 28, 2011)