From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Aug 5, 2011
Case No. 4:10-cv-51 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 4:10-cv-51.

August 5, 2011


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed her report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) on July 18, 2011 [Court Doc. 21.] Neither party filed objections within the given 14 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Lee's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Lee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b).

Accordingly, the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Court Doc. 19] is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Court Doc. 13] is GRANTED to the extent it seeks remand of Plaintiff's claim for benefits. The Commissioner's decision denying benefits is REVERSED and the instant action is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Clerk shall close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perry v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester
Aug 5, 2011
Case No. 4:10-cv-51 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Perry v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:PAUL W. PERRY, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Winchester

Date published: Aug 5, 2011

Citations

Case No. 4:10-cv-51 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 5, 2011)