From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perron v. Withrow

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 22, 1967
196 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1967)

Opinion

No. 35833.

March 22, 1967.

Writ of Certiorari to Florida Industrial Commission.

Miller, Cone, Owen, Wagner Nugent and Larry Klein, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Eugene L. Heinrich, of McCune, Hiaasen, Crum Ferris, Fort Lauderdale, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorneys' fees also is denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perron v. Withrow

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 22, 1967
196 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1967)
Case details for

Perron v. Withrow

Case Details

Full title:GERTRUDE S. PERRON, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT E. PERRON…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 22, 1967

Citations

196 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1967)