From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perrin v. Izzulino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 6, 2017
Civil Action No. 16-791 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 6, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 16-791

02-06-2017

JAMES PERRIN, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT IZZULINO, et al., Defendants.

cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): James Perrin 35370-068 2240 Hubbard Rd. Youngstown, OH 44505 cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record



Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(l)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On January 11, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 32) recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) be denied, but that the Court stay and administratively close this action until the conclusion of Plaintiff's criminal proceedings. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on Plaintiff, and no objections have been filed.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, it hereby is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) is DENIED, without prejudice to later renewal if and as appropriate; this case hereby is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED; and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

If and when Plaintiff's criminal charges are dismissed or resolved in his favor, he may file with this Court a motion to reopen his case. Plaintiff is forewarned, however, that any such motion must be appropriately supported, and, should it be in contradiction to information available in the public-record (e.g., his criminal docket), the request will, in the absence of good cause shown, be summarily denied. Finally, Defendant Matthew Truesdell's Motion (Doc. 34) for extension of time to file a responsive pleading is GRANTED, and his deadline for answering or otherwise responding to the Complaint is extended until thirty (30) days after the Court enters an order lifting the stay and reopening this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. February 6, 2017

s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): James Perrin
35370-068
2240 Hubbard Rd.
Youngstown, OH 44505 cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Perrin v. Izzulino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 6, 2017
Civil Action No. 16-791 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Perrin v. Izzulino

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PERRIN, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT IZZULINO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 6, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 16-791 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 6, 2017)

Citing Cases

Wright v. City of Omaha

(staying § 1983 case alleging unconstitutional search and seizure under principles articulated in Wallace v.…

Miles v. Krowiak

Doc. 13 at 5; see Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Heck, however, “did not address the favorable…