From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perriconi v. St. John's Preparatory H. S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 2002
290 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-01372

Argued January 3, 2002.

January 28, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant St. John's Preparatory High School appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated December 14, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Paris Maintenance Company, Inc., separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied its separate motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Murphy Higgins, LLP, New Rochelle, N.Y. (Robert D. Schapiro of counsel), for appellant St. John's Preparatory High School.

Ira B. Pollack, Forest Hills, N.Y., for appellant Paris Maintenance Company, Inc.

Benedict P. Morelli, New York, N.Y. (Laurie DiPreta of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motions are granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when he tripped and fell on a raised and cracked portion of the public sidewalk abutting property owned by the defendant St. John's Preparatory High School and maintained by the defendant Paris Maintenance Company, Inc. An abutting landowner will be liable to a pedestrian injured by a defect in a public sidewalk when the owner either created the defect or caused it to occur by a special use, or when a statute or ordinance obligates the owner to maintain the sidewalk and makes the owner liable for injuries caused by a breach of that obligation (see, Capobianco v. Mari, 267 A.D.2d 191). Although there was evidence that the defendants repaired the sidewalk on the block where the plaintiff fell, they made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by relying upon the plaintiff's own deposition testimony that no repairs had been made in the area where the accident occurred (see, Yass v. Deepdale Gardens, 187 A.D.2d 506). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Consequently, summary judgment should have been granted to the defendants.

GOLDSTEIN, J.P., McGINITY, LUCIANO and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perriconi v. St. John's Preparatory H. S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 2002
290 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Perriconi v. St. John's Preparatory H. S

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH PERRICONI, respondent, v. ST. JOHN'S PREPARATORY HIGH SCHOOL, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 28, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 546 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 698

Citing Cases

Rosemary v. New York

A contractor may be held liable for an affirmative act of negligence which results in the creation of a…

Rojas v. City of New York

Neither the permit copies nor the photograph copies yields evidence that the mill-work performed by Columbus…