From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perotti v. Daniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03315-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03315-BNB

04-17-2012

JOHN W. PEROTTI, Applicant, v. WARDEN CHARLIE DANIELS, and OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY (OAPA), Respondents.


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

This matter is before the Court on the motion (ECF No. 31) that Applicant, John W. Perotti, filed pro se on April 16, 2012, in which he asks for a thirty-day extension of time to respond to the preliminary response (ECF No. 29) filed on April 6, 2012, by the Ohio Adult Parole Authority. The motion is DENIED.

The Court notes that an amended preliminary response (ECF No. 32) also was filed on April 16, 2012, by Respondent Charles A. Daniels. Therefore, Mr. Perotti will be allowed twenty-one (21) days from the date of this minute order in which to file his reply to both preliminary responses.


Summaries of

Perotti v. Daniels

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03315-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Perotti v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:JOHN W. PEROTTI, Applicant, v. WARDEN CHARLIE DANIELS, and OHIO ADULT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 17, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03315-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 17, 2012)