From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Impressa Perosa, S. R. L. v. Buti

U.S.
Oct 5, 1998
525 U.S. 826 (1998)

Summary

holding that employment claim may be brought under Title II

Summary of this case from Lavia v. Pennsylvania, Dept. of Corrections

Opinion

No. 97-2062.

October 5, 1998, OCTOBER TERM, 1998.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 139 F. 3d 98.


Summaries of

Impressa Perosa, S. R. L. v. Buti

U.S.
Oct 5, 1998
525 U.S. 826 (1998)

holding that employment claim may be brought under Title II

Summary of this case from Lavia v. Pennsylvania, Dept. of Corrections

holding that "employment coverage is clear from the language and structure of Title II" and deferring to the Attorney General's "reasonable construction of the statutory language."

Summary of this case from Clark v. City of Chicago

holding that wifes quantified interest in husbands military retirement benefit as of a specified date as set forth in the dissolution decree could not be reduced by husbands post-dissolution waiver of retirement benefit upon obtaining civil service employment

Summary of this case from In re Rhoades

applying Title II to employment discrimination context

Summary of this case from Staats v. County of Sawyer

noting that the services advertised, not the advertising itself, must have been "rendered in commerce" to satisfy the "use in commerce" requirement of the Lanham Act

Summary of this case from Barefoot Architect, Inc. v. Bunge
Case details for

Impressa Perosa, S. R. L. v. Buti

Case Details

Full title:IMPRESSA PEROSA, S. R. L. v. BUTI ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 5, 1998

Citations

525 U.S. 826 (1998)

Citing Cases

In re Hutchings

lo v. Providian Fin. Corp., 257 B.R. 245, 249 (N.D. Ill. 2000),aff'd, 239 F.3d 876 (7th Cir. 2001); Salem v.…

Davila v. the City of New York

'The rule is well-settled in this circuit that a party may not, in order to defeat a summary judgment motion,…