From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perorazio v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 10, 2022
No. 1099-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 10, 2022)

Opinion

1099-21S

01-10-2022

David Charles Perorazio Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Patrick J. Urda Judge

This case is currently calendared on the Court's Columbus, Ohio, remote trial session, which is scheduled to begin January 31, 2022.

On January 6, 2022, the Commissioner filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The Commissioner explains that petitioner, David Perorazio, paid the liability at issue before the issuance of the notice of deficiency. He further states that such an advance payment is subject to immediate assessment under section 6213(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, rendering the notice a nullity. The Commissioner represents that Mr. Perorzio does not object to the granting of this motion. Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that the Commissioner's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Perorazio v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 10, 2022
No. 1099-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Perorazio v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:David Charles Perorazio Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 10, 2022

Citations

No. 1099-21S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 10, 2022)