From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peronace v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 16, 2024
Civil Action 23-3943-KSM (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-3943-KSM

04-16-2024

JOSEPH PERONACE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Defendant.


ORDER

KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.

AND NOW this 16th day of April, 2024, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26), Defendant's opposition brief (Doc. No. 28), Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27), Peronace's opposition brief (Doc. No. 29), and the arguments made by counsel at oral argument on April 9, 2024, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court declines to grant judgment in Plaintiff's favor as a sanction for spoliation, but at trial, the Court will instruct the jury that they may presume that the lost video footage was unfavorable to the City.
2. The City's motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Peronace v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 16, 2024
Civil Action 23-3943-KSM (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Peronace v. City of Philadelphia

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH PERONACE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 16, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 23-3943-KSM (E.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2024)