From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pernice v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 17, 1999
744 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-00509.

Opinion filed November 17, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Robert L. Doyel, Judge.

Domingo G. Alvarez, III, Winter Haven, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Gary Pernice appeals an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to nine years' imprisonment for three counts of grand theft. The State alleged two probation violations: a violation of special condition 4 based on Pernice's failure to make a lump sum restitution payment of $500,000, and a violation of condition 3 based on Pernice engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. The trial court found Pernice in violation of both conditions. The record supports the court's findings as to condition 3; however, the court erred by finding Pernice in violation of special condition 4 without first finding that Pernice had the financial ability to make the lump sum restitution payment. See McCoy v. State, 730 So.2d 803 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Pernice's probation, but remand with directions to remove the violation of condition 4 from the revocation order.

Affirmed in part; remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., NORTHCUTT, and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Pernice v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 17, 1999
744 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Pernice v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARY PERNICE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 17, 1999

Citations

744 So. 2d 596 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)