From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Permento v. Story

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1921
198 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)

Opinion

June, 1921.

Present — Blackmar, P.J., Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Manning, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon authority of Weigand v. United Traction Co. ( 221 N.Y. 39); Dolfini v. Erie R.R. Co. (178 id. 1); Farrell v. Fire Insurance Salvage Corps. ( 189 App. Div. 795). In Austin v. Long Island R.R. Co. (69 Hun; 67; affd., 140 N.Y. 639), and Kaplan v. Posner ( 192 App. Div. 59), cited by appellant, there was evidence of obstructions to plaintiff's view of the approaching train or vehicle, which is entirely absent in the case at bar. In the case at bar plaintiff testified that there was no obstruction.


Summaries of

Permento v. Story

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1921
198 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)
Case details for

Permento v. Story

Case Details

Full title:JOHN PERMENTO, Appellant, v. ROBERT H. STORY and SANFORD STORY, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1921

Citations

198 App. Div. 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 1921)