From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Permenter v. Schultz

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 6, 2017
CASE NO. 1D17-0993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 6, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17-0993

06-06-2017

JAMES RANDALL PERMENTER, Petitioner, v. KIMBERLY BARILEY SCHULTZ, Respondent.

James Randall Permenter, pro se, Petitioner. No response for Respondent.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction James Randall Permenter, pro se, Petitioner. No response for Respondent. PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Smartt v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 771 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). WETHERELL, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Permenter v. Schultz

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 6, 2017
CASE NO. 1D17-0993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Permenter v. Schultz

Case Details

Full title:JAMES RANDALL PERMENTER, Petitioner, v. KIMBERLY BARILEY SCHULTZ…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jun 6, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 1D17-0993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 6, 2017)